检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄锴[1]
出 处:《时代法学》2016年第4期39-47,共9页Presentday Law Science
摘 要:在法律、法规相对匮乏的给付行政领域,行政程序作为一种导控权力的途径值得给予重点关注与研究。行政救助中的"经济状况调查"因其所具有的授益与侵益的双重性格,是具有代表性的给付行政程序之一。通过对现有规范中的"经济状况调查"梳理可以发现其在实施主体、实施对象、实施手段、实施过程四个方面均存在问题与不足。给付行政视野下的行政模式应当包含以权利中心、过程交互为指引的积极面向和以目的相关、最小侵害为指引的消极面向。以此为基点重新审视"经济状况调查",应在各方面均作出修正和调整。As one path to control power,administration procedure is deserved to be focused on and researched in the government benefit administration field that laws and regulations are not perfect.Revenue recognition in administrative rescuing is one of the representative benefit administrative procedures,as it has double characters including benefit and violation.We can conclude that the executive subject,object,measures and process still need to be improved through reviewing the revenue recognition of current regulations.The administration mode in the field of government benefit administration should contain positive aspects which are right-centered,and directed by process interaction,and negative aspects which are related with intent and directed by minimal violation,which will be the basic points of this article to review revenue recognition.It will be concluded that each aspect need to be revised and adjusted.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222