检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《时代法学》2016年第4期66-71,共6页Presentday Law Science
摘 要:我国贪污、受贿犯罪采取的是"数额主导制"的立法模式,将犯罪数额作为定罪和量刑的主要标准。在对"数额主导制"深刻反思的基础上,立法者对贪污、受贿罪的罪刑体系进行了大幅修改,以"犯罪情节中心制"的立法模式替代"数额主导制",将犯罪情节置于犯罪数额平行的位置。在"犯罪情节中心制"之下,情节因素仍然存在着被边缘化的风险,从宽条款的规定也不尽合理。应当通过司法解释对概括数额进行明确和统一,并提升犯罪情节因素的可操作性。The legislative model of corruption and bribery of China is "amount–led system",which the criminal amount as the main standard of conviction and sentencing.However,the legislator plans to revise the crime and punishment system significantly,the "amount–led system"will be replaced by "amount and cirumstance system",the circumstances of crime have the equal status as the crime amount.And there are some problems in the "amount and cirumstance system",such as the circumstances of crime may be marginalized,and the term of lenient punishment is not so reasonable.We should explain the amount and circumstances of crime detailed,and make the law have fairly operability.
关 键 词:《刑法修正案(九)》 贪污、受贿罪 犯罪数额 犯罪情节
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.51