检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗晓茂[1] 谭蜀川 陈海涛[1] 张圆[1] 邵晖[1] 杨丽春[1]
机构地区:[1]昆明医科大学第三附属医院云南省肿瘤医院超声科,昆明市650118
出 处:《临床超声医学杂志》2016年第6期389-392,共4页Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine
基 金:云南省昆明市西山区科技计划项目(【2014】西科字43号)
摘 要:目的探讨经直肠双重超声造影、CT、MRI检查在直肠癌术前淋巴结转移中的应用价值。方法对48例直肠癌患者术前行经直肠双重造影,其中42例同时行CT检查,39例同时行MRI检查,分别对区域淋巴结转移情况进行N分期,并与术后病理比较。结果经直肠双重超声造影、CT及MRI诊断N分期的准确率分别为77.1%(37/48)、81.0%(34/42)及79.5%(31/39),三者比较差异无统计学意义。结论经直肠双重超声造影、CT、MRI均是术前诊断和评价直肠癌淋巴结转移情况的有效方法。Objective To investigate the clinical value of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography(DCUS),CT and MRI in preoperative evaluation of lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer. Methods Forty-eight patients with rectal carcinoma underwent DCUS,forty-two cases were examined by CT and thirty-nine cases by MRI examination. The results of N staging were compared with histopathology findings of the resected specimens. Results The diagnosing accuracy of N staging of the rectal cancer by DCUS,CT and MRI scanning were 77.1%(37/48),81.0%(34/42) and 79.5%(31/39),respectively,there were no significant difference among the three methods. Conclusion DCUS,CT and MRI are useful for correct preoperative identification and precise evaluation of lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15