辩诉交易与刑事速裁程序比较研究  

The Comparative Study between Plea Bargaining and Criminal Immediate Judgment Procedure

作　　者：李哲[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学研究生院,北京100088

出　　处：《三明学院学报》2016年第3期41-44,共4页Journal of Sanming University

摘　　要：在美国联邦和州法院,辩诉交易成为大多数刑事案件的最主要处理方式。我国在部分地区试点实施的刑事速裁程序,与英美法系国家的辩诉交易制度有着相似之处,某种意义上是对辩诉交易制度的学习和借鉴。刑事速裁程序的实施对于提高诉讼效率、节约司法资源等方面发挥着重要的作用,但该程序仍然暴露出一定的不足,通过对两种程序的对比,应当完善刑事速裁程序。The plea bargaining system is one of the major ways of coordinating criminal cases in the federal courts of the United States and state courts. In China, criminal immediate judgment procedure that have been carried out in some pilot dis- tricts has some similarities with the plea bargaining of common law system countries. In a certain sense, it is learned from the plea bargaining. The implementation of criminal immediate judgment procedure plays an important role in improving the efficiency of litigation and saving judicial resources. However, there also exist some disadvantages. It is suggested that crimi- nal immediate judgment procedure should be perfected by comparing the two procedures.

关 键 词：辩诉交易 刑事速裁程序 有罪答辩 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]