检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]首都师范大学北京市学习与认知重点实验室,北京100089
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2016年第3期566-571,共6页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:国家自然科学基金(31271114)
摘 要:目的:探讨此刻觉察(Present Awareness,PA)冥想的镇疼效果,并与专注式冥想(Focused Attention,FA)进行比较。方法:招募67名健康在校大学生,随机分为FA、PA和疼痛教育组(Education Group,EDU)。分别进行20分钟的训练。训练前后进行冷压任务,测试冰水期和恢复期的疼痛、痛苦程度。结果:PA组在冰水期的疼痛、痛苦改善程度显著优于FA组和EDU组;在恢复期同样优于FA组和EDU组,恢复期痛苦改善程度上,FA组也优于EDU组。结论:本研究从冷压任务疼痛、痛苦改善方面提供证据,说明了短期PA的有效性。Objective: This study aimed to compare effects of pain management with FA(Focused Attention) and PA (Present Awareness) in cold pressor test. Methods: Sixty-seven healthy university students were recruited and randomized assigned as FA group, PA group, and Pain education group(EDU group). Twenty-minute trainings were conducted between the pre-test and post-test. Pain intensity and distress were measured in the cold water period and recovery period. Re- suits: In the cold water period, PA group showed greater improvement than FA group and EDU group in pain intensity and distress; In the recovery period, PA group also showed greater improvement than the other two groups, and FA group was al- so more effective than EDU group. Conclusion: Short-term PA is efficient in reducing pain intensity and distress, as well as in recovering from pain.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28