实体性权利或程序性权利——对我国股东派生诉讼制度的实证研究与反思  

Material Right or Procedural Right——Practical Research and Reflection of Derivative Suit in China

作　　者：郑观[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院法学研究所

出　　处：《北华大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第3期61-68,共8页Journal of Beihua University(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：我国立法者于2005年将股东派生诉讼制度规定于《公司法》之中,这一制度的核心在于赋予中小股东在公司管理层违反忠实、勤勉义务时相应的诉权。但该制度在司法实践中却早已存在,由于当时缺乏统一立法,法官在具体案件的审理中,根据自身对于相关理论的理解加以适用,故而对该制度的适用条件等方面存在较大的差异。虽然相关法律的出台一定程度上解决了上述问题,但由于立法者对于程序性规定的忽视,从而导致实体法和程序法之间产生了不协调之处。Derivative suit of shareholders was introduced into Chinese Company Law in 2005. This gives the minor shareholders the right to pursue a suit against the management of the corporations when they disobey the duty of loyalty or duty of care. However,before its codification,this legal institution has already been adopted in the judicial judgments.Due to the lack of codified norms,the judgments varied from each other tremendously.Although this problem is solved to a certain extent,the law maker neglected the procedural rules related to derivative suit,which results in the discordance between material right and procedural legal norms.

关 键 词：股东派生诉讼制度 实体性权利 程序性权利 

分 类 号：D925[政治法律—诉讼法学]