检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东农工商职业技术学院管理系,广东广州510507
出 处:《广东农工商职业技术学院学报》2016年第2期78-81,共4页Journal of Guangdong Agriculture Industry Business Polytechnic
摘 要:刑事速裁改革试点过程中,审级制度是理论和实践关注讨论的焦点。速裁判决的上诉权利保障和二审审查范围是刑事速裁审级制度建设过程应当思考的关键内容。国外在刑事案件简易化方面有着成熟的实践经验,参考国外成熟经验,结合中国的实际,对刑事速裁审级制度提出建议。In the process of the pilot of criminal expeditious procedure, trial grade systemthe is the focus of the discussion on the theory and practice. The protection of the right of appeal for the judgment and the scope of the second instance review is the key content during the construction process of the judicial hierarchy of criminal triM. Simplification of criminal cases has mature practical experience in foreign countries. This paper proposes the sug- gestions of the judicial hierarchy of criminal trial drawing on the experience of foreign mature experience combin- ing with the reality of China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117