检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱道明[1] 高飞[1] 豆正莉[1] 孙锟[1] 陆宗海[1]
机构地区:[1]安徽医科大学附属巢湖医院消化科,合肥238000
出 处:《中国临床保健杂志》2016年第4期380-382,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Healthcare
摘 要:目的探讨逆行性胰胆管造影(ERCP)在早期急性胆源性胰腺炎(ABP)患者中的临床应用价值。方法分析120例早期ABP患者的临床资料,采用ERCP治疗的患者为60例作为观察组,采用保守治疗的60例患者作为对照组。对两组患者的治疗有效率、病死率以及并发症发生率进行分析。结果观察组患者的治疗有效率(95.0%)与对照组(76.7%)比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者的病死率(1.7%)与对照组(13.3%)比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者的并发症发生率(11.7%)与对照组(30.0%)比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采用ERCP治疗早期ABP的有效性和安全性高,可考虑作为ABP患者的首选治疗方法。Objective To investigate value of clinical applications of ERCP in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis.Meth-ods A retrospective study was conducted on 120 patients with acute biliary pancreatitis in the Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical U-niversity between January 2014 and December 2015.The subjects were divided into two groups:observation group (n =60)and con-trol group (n =60)groups,were respectively treated with ERCP and internal medical therapy.The validity rate,mortality rate and the incidence of complications were recorded.Results The validity rate of the observation group(95.0%)was better than that of the control group (76.7%),the differences were statistically significant (P 〈0.05 ).The mortality rate of the observation group (1.7%)was lower than the control group(13.3%),the statistically significant differences(P 〈0.05);The incidence of complica-tions of the observation group(1 1.7%)was lower than the control group(30.0%),the statistically significant differences(P 〈0.05).Conclusion ERCP is an effective and safe method for the treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis and can be recommended as the first choice of treatment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.21