证人的不被强迫自证其罪权  

On the Witness' s Privilege against Self- incrimination

作　　者：陈学权[1] 郭恒[1] 

机构地区：[1]对外经济贸易大学,北京100029

出　　处：《国家检察官学院学报》2016年第4期133-143,175-176,共11页Journal of National Prosecutors College

基　　金：国家"2011计划"司法文明协同创新研究中心的研究成果;司法部2013年国家法治与法学理论研究项目"不被强迫自证其罪在我国的解释与适用"(13SFB3021)资助

摘　　要：证人是否享有不被强迫自证其罪权在境外法治国家的立法中呈现三种不同的类型。相关国际公约正在逐渐认可证人享有不被强迫自证其罪权,我国应当明确承认证人享有此权利。由于证人与被追诉人在刑事诉讼中的地位和角色不同,两者的不被强迫自证其罪权在行使条件、保障程序等方面存在重大差异。为了平衡真实发现与保障证人不被强迫自证其罪权的关系,我国应当赋予证人有限的罪行豁免,严格限定豁免案件的适用范围,并完善证人作证的豁免程序。In foreign countries there are three different types of legislation towards the witness' s privilege against self- incrimination. China should also clearly acknowledge such privilege. Because of the different status and roles between the witness and the accused in the criminal procedure,the privilege against self- incrimination of the witness and the accused is significantly different in its exercising con-ditions and guaranteeing procedures,etc. In order to balance the relations between the discovery of truth and the protection of the privilege against self- incrimination,we should give the witness a limited exemption of crime. The scope of crime that can be exempted shall be strictly limited and the exemption procedure shall be well- built.

关 键 词：证人 不被强迫自证其罪权 作证豁免 如实作证义务 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]