检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘子立[1]
出 处:《史学史研究》2016年第2期1-8,共8页Journal of Historiography
摘 要:《东观汉记》作为东汉一朝的国史,对于东汉历史研究意义重大。然而,该书不仅很早就已散佚,而且关于其起讫年代、篇卷数量,在文献中也存在着几种不同的说法。这种情形的出现源于《东观汉记》经历了漫长而复杂的成书过程,亦源于《东观汉记》有别于一般正史的"随写随传"的传播方式,以及后人在整理、抄录《东观汉记》一书时,尚缺乏严密的文献整理条例。对这些问题的研究,有助于我们更好地理解今存《东观汉记》辑本的体例与文献性质。As a standard history on Eastern Han Dynasty,DONGGUANHANJI plays a significant role in research of history of it. However,it was lost very early,and there are some arguments about the beginning and the end time recorded in it and the number of its rolls. The reasons are as follow: firstly,compilation of it was a long and complex process. Secondly,the spreading of it was different from that of other standard histories,whose every part was published as soon as it was completed. Thirdly,when the followers collected and copied this book,they didn't have rigorous regulations to follow. The answers to these problems were helpful for us to understand the existing DONGGUANHANJI's stylistic rules,layout and features much further.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28