基于元分析的先动型环境战略与企业绩效关系的研究  

The Relationship between Proactive Environmental Strategies and Firm Performance:A Meta-analysis

作　　者：迟楠[1] 李垣[1] 郭婧洲[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院,上海200052

出　　处：《管理工程学报》2016年第3期9-14,共6页Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management

基　　金：国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(71132006)

摘　　要：本文利用元分析方法,以55篇文献中103个独立样本为对象,研究先动型环境战略选择与企业绩效的关系,并基于制度理论探索影响企业选择先动型环境战略的主要因素。元分析结果表明,正式的制度因素和非正式制度因素都可以促使企业选择先动型环境战略,且非正式制度因素的影响作用比正式的制度因素更大。同时,研完发现先动型环境战略对企业的环境绩效和经济绩效都有正向影响,并且该战略对企业环境绩效的影响大于其对经济绩效的影响。With the worsening of global environment, firms, government, and academia have paid increasing attention to the conflicts between business activities and natural environment. Firms utilize proactive environmental strategies to solve pollution problems in the production process. The pollution prevention technologies have been used to gain cost advantages, thereby improving financial performance and green reputation. These two results can help firms achieve better economic performance. However, in the existing literature there are inconsistent views about the influence of proactive environmental strategy on both corporate environmental performance and improved economic performance. The proactive environmental strategies have varying influence. This study provides new insights into these areas of existing research and proposes that institutional factors can influence the proactive environmental strategy and affect both economic and environmental performance. Through a meta-analysis of 103 independent samples reported in 55 studies, we tested the institutional theory in the research of proactive environmental strategies and finn performance. This study provides a more comprehensive framework which inte^ates institutional factors, environment strategy and firm performance to explain how institutional factors affect the proactive environment strategies and how this strategy influences firm performance differently. By use of a meta-analysis, our results show that formal and informal institutions have proactive effect on the proaetive environmental strategies. In addition, informal institutions have a stronger effect than formal institutions. Furthermore, our findings indicate that the proactive environmental strategy positively affects both environmental performance and economic performance of firms. Moreover, firms utilize this strategy to achieve stronger environment performance than economic performance. In the first part, we reviewed previous research and came up with our research questions. Our research questions

关 键 词：环境战略 制度因素 环境绩效 经济绩效 

分 类 号：F272.3[经济管理—企业管理]