检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《数理医药学杂志》2016年第7期972-973,共2页Journal of Mathematical Medicine
摘 要:目的:探究老年人牙髓塑化治疗慢性根尖周炎的临床疗效。方法:选取某院2010年1月~2012年1月收治的100例慢性根尖周炎患者,全部患者的年龄都超过60岁,并随机的将其分为两组,甲组采用塑化治疗,乙组采用根管治疗,每组50例(50颗牙),术前全部都进行X线片的拍摄,根据樊明文主编的《牙体牙髓病学》的治疗方法为标准。结果:甲组的治愈率明显低于乙组,两组对比差异不具有统计学意义(P〉0.05),甲组3年治愈率明显低于对照组,两组对比差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。讨论:老年人牙髓塑化治疗慢性根尖周炎的临床效果不佳。Objective:To explore the clinical effect of of treating chronic apical periarthritis with elderly pulp plasticizing.Methods:Select 100 cases of chronic apical periarthritis treated in a hospital from January 2010 to January 2012,who were over 60 years old,and divided into two groups randomly.Group A were treated with plasticizing,and Group B were treated with root canal,with 50 cases in each group (50 teeth). Before the surgery,all the patients were examined by X ray film shooting,and were treated by the method proposed in tooth pulp epidemiology edited by Fan Mingwen.Results:The cure rate of Group A was signifi-cantly lower than that of Group B,the difference of the two groups was not statistically significant (P〉0.05).cure rate of Group A in the first 3 years was significantly lower than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05).Conclusion:The clinical effect of of treating chronic apical periarthritis with elderly pulp plasticizing is not good.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200