检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]商洛市中医医院超声科,陕西商洛726000 [2]西安交通大学医学院附属陕西省肿瘤医院,陕西西安710061 [3]陕西省红会医院骨科,陕西西安710004
出 处:《现代肿瘤医学》2016年第16期2593-2597,共5页Journal of Modern Oncology
基 金:陕西省科技厅社会发展攻关计划项目(编号:2012K13-02-39)
摘 要:目的:评价常规超声(US)、超声造影(CEUS)及二者联合诊断甲状腺乳头状癌(papillary thyroid carcinoma,PTC)的价值。方法:回顾性分析80例甲状腺实性单发结节的US特征及CEUS表现。评价US、CEUS及二者联合应用诊断甲状腺PTC的价值。结果:US组诊断敏感度、特异度及准确率分别是88.0%、80.0%和85.0%,CEUS组诊断敏感度、特异度及准确率分别是94.0%、90.0%及92.5%,二者联合应用的敏感度、特异度及准确率分别是96.7%、92.7%和94.9%。结论:典型的PTC结节US可独立做出较明确的诊断,慢进、晚增及低增强对PTC具有较高的价值,二者联合应用大于各自单独检查的诊断效能。Objective:To assess the value of conventional ultrasound,contrast - enhanced ultrasound and combine both methods in diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma(PTC). Methods:The features of US and CEUS were ana-lyzed retrospectively in 80 cases with solid thyroid nodules,and the value of conventional ultrasound,contrast - en-hanced ultrasound and combine of both methods were assessed in diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Results:Sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of diagnosis were 88. 0% ,80. 0% and 85. 0% respectively in group of US. Sensi-tivity,specificity and accuracy of diagnosis were 94. 0% ,90. 0% and 92. 5% respectively in group of CEUS. And sen-sitivity,specificity and accuracy of diagnosis were 96. 7% ,92. 7% and 94. 9% respectively in group of combined both methods. Conclusion:US could make correct diagnosis independently in typical PTC nodules. However slow perfu-sion,delayed increase and weak enhancement have higher value for diagnosis of PTC. Efficiency of combined both methods was higher than either of the two methods.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222