检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国海洋大学法政学院 [2]华东政法大学法律文明史研究院
出 处:《社会科学》2016年第7期107-118,共12页Journal of Social Sciences
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目"法律文明史"(项目编号:11&ZD081)子课题"法的国际化与本土化"的阶段性成果
摘 要:司法是法治体系的基石,司法改革则是推动司法体系不断完善的重要途径。新加坡的司法体系经20世纪90年代以来的司法改革,一直处于世界前列,并引起世界范围内的关注。然而,学界关于新加坡司法改革,尤其是关于2006年以来新加坡新一轮的司法改革的研究颇少。实际上,新加坡第一轮司法改革获得巨大成功的同时也产生了很多问题,在新一轮的司法改革中,这些问题得到了解决,相应制度也不断完善。新加坡的司法改革独具特色,体现了新加坡司法体系独特特点的同时也能为其他国家的司法改革提供一定的参考或借鉴。The judicial system is the cornerstone of the legal system, and the judicial reform is of vital importance for promoting the judicial system. Since the judicial reform began in the 1990s, the judicial system of Singapore is always ranked in the forefront of the world, and it attracts much attention worldwide. However, there are only a few studies on the judicial reform of Singapore, especially with regards to the new round of judicial reform there since 2006. Actually, there is a great success as well as a lot of problems after the first round of judicial reform in Singapore. During the new round of judicial reform, the problems have been solved, and the relevant system has been improved. The judicial reform in Singapore is unique, which not only shows the characteristics of Singapore and its judicial system, but also could be an example or reference for the judicial reform in other countries.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.50