欧美图书馆学博士学位论文时间分布、授予机构与学位类型分析  

Analysis of the Time Distribution,Conferred Institutions and the Degree Types on Library Science Doctor's Dissertations from Europe and America

作　　者：杨志刚[1] 刘竟[1] 张新兴[2] 

机构地区：[1]江苏大学科技信息研究所,江苏镇江212013 [2]广州大学图书馆,广州510006

出　　处：《图书馆》2016年第7期73-78,共6页Library

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"欧美图书馆学博士学位研究课题分析"(项目编号:09CTQ006)的研究成果之一

摘　　要：以PQDD数据库中1925-2013年3973篇文献为数据来源,从论文数量、时间序列、学位授予机构、学位授予类型方面对欧美图书馆学博士学位论文的分布特征进行解读。研究结果表明:欧美图书馆学博士学位论文早期发展迟缓,产出低,中期迅速增长并逐渐至高峰,近期出现些许滑落,但保持相对稳定;欧美图书馆学博士学位论文的年代分布与社会政治、经济以及信息技术的变革基本一致;学位授予机构数量总体上与论文数量随时间变化的曲线走向相一致,89年间图书馆学博士研究发展处于非常平稳的状态,虽然以美国各机构为首的培养机构增多,但机构培养人数与研究成果均值增长并不明显;常用的学位授予类型是哲学、教育学、管理学博士学位,图书馆学情报学博士学位应用并不广泛,认可度不高。3973 doctor＇s dissertations data from 1925 to 2013 in PQDD database were used as data source, this paper analyzes these dissertations distribution in quantity, time, institutions and degree types. The result show that doctor＇s dissertations of library science from Europe and America published fewer dissertations in the early period, rapidly grow in the middle period, and develop slower than middle period in recent period. Furthermore, the development and status of library science has also influenced the graduate education as well as the production of dissertation which time layout consistent with the tendency of economic and information scientific revolution. Meanwhile, the sum changes between degree-awarding institutions and dissertations are synchronous, and doctor research of library science stably developed in 89 years. Besides, although training institutions sum is generally increasing, the average sum growth of doctor graduates and outputs isn＇t obvious. The general degree granting types are Ph.D., D.Ed and D.M.. D.L.S. and D.L.I.S. are not adopted widespread.

关 键 词：图书馆学 博士学位论文 图书馆学教育 

分 类 号：G649[文化科学—高等教育学]