检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡艳玲[1] 张金磊[1] 侯晓雯[1] 金力[1] 张颐[1]
机构地区:[1]中国医科大学附属第一医院,辽宁沈阳110001
出 处:《肿瘤学杂志》2016年第7期549-553,共5页Journal of Chinese Oncology
基 金:沈阳市科技局计划项目(F14-158-9-36)
摘 要:[目的]系统评价雌孕激素替代治疗对卵巢癌发病风险的影响。[方法]计算机检索CNKI数据库、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库、VIP数据库,PUBMED、Web of science、EMASE、Cochrane Library等数据库,收集2000~2014年公开发表的雌孕激素替代治疗对卵巢癌发病风险影响的随机对照试验和病例对照试验,对雌孕激素替代治疗对卵巢癌发病风险的影响进行合并分析。[结果]最终纳入7个研究,共计1 167 430位受试者。Meta分析结果显示雌孕激素替代治疗与否对卵巢癌发病风险高低差异无统计学意义(OR=0.945,95%CI:0.830~1.077,P=0.399)。[结论]雌孕激素替代治疗与卵巢癌发病风险的关系不确定,故不能以此为由中断目前雌孕激素替代治疗等临床实践。[Objective] To assessed the association of menopausal hormone replacement therapy(HRT) with risk of ovarian cancer. [Methods] Databases CNKI,Wan Fang Database,CBM,VIP database,PUBMED,Web of science,EMASE,Cochrane Library were searched to collect randomized controlled trials(RCT) and case-control trials concerning the association of HRT with the risk of ovarian cancer,published between 2000 and 2014. The quality of studies was evaluated and the meta-analysis of eligible literature was performed. [Results] A total of 7 trials involving 1 167 430 subjects were included. The result of meta-analysis showed that there was no statistical significance in the risk of ovarian cancer between the patients with or without HRT(OR=0.945,95% CI:0.830~1.077,P=0.399). [Conclusion] The relationship between HRT and the risk of ovarian cancer is uncertain,so it is unwise to stop the HRT associated clinical practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.60