检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国医药导报》2016年第19期84-87,共4页China Medical Herald
基 金:陕西省中医药管理局中医药科研课题(13-LC013)
摘 要:目的探讨辨证施穴康复对持续性植物状态(PVS)患者脑电生理及意识恢复的影响。方法选取2014年1月~2015年6月西安市中医医院收治的60例PVS患者,按照随机数字表法将其分成观察组和对照组,各30例。两组均采用常规治疗和护理,观察组在此基础上采用辨证施穴按摩康复护理,针对患者不同中医证型采用不同穴位按摩手法,并采用视、听、嗅、味、触觉和运动刺激性康复护理方法,共行3个月。观察比较两组意识恢复率、格拉斯哥昏迷指数(GCS)评分及脑电生理。结果观察组意识恢复率明显高于对照组(P〈0.05)。两组治疗前后及意识恢复患者恢复前后脑电图差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),而体感诱发电位、脑干听觉诱发电位比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),且观察组改善更明显(P〈0.05);观察组意识未恢复患者治疗前后体感诱发电位、脑干听觉诱发电位评分差异也有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。观察组治疗后GCS评分显著高于对照组(P〈0.05)。结论辨证施穴按摩康复护理能促进PVS患者意识恢复,改善脑电生理,且结合脑干听觉、体感诱发电位检查可提高预后判断准确性。Objective To explore the effect of acupoint rehabilitation based on syndrome differentiation for brain electric physiology and recovery of consciousness in patients with persistent vegetative state (PVS). Methods Sixty patients with PVS admitted to Xi'an Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2014 to June 2015 were selected and randomly divided into observation group and control group according to the random number table method, with 30 cases in each group. The patients of two groups were treated with conventional treatment and care, on basis of which, the observation group was given aeupoint massage rehabilitation nursing based on syndrome differentiation, and they were taken different acupoint massage for patients with different traditional Chinese medicine syndrome differentiation, and they also used visual, auditory, olfactory, taste, touch and exercise stimulation rehabilitation nursing methods, total for 3 months. The recovery rate of consciousness, Glasgow coma scale (GCS) scores and brain electric physiology of the two groups were observed and compared. Results The recovery rate of consciousness in the observation group was significantly higher than that of control group (P 〈 0.05). The electroencephalogram changes had no significant differences before and after treatment in the two groups and before and after recovery of consciousness in the recovery patients of the two groups (P 〉 0.05), and there were significant differences in brainstem auditory evoked potential and somatosen- sory evoked potential (P 〈 0.05), the improvement in the observation group was more obvious (P 〈 0.05). There were significant differences of brainstem auditory evoked potential and somatosensory evoked potential in the patients with- out recovery of consciousness of the observation group before and after treatment (P 〈 0.05). The GCS score of the ob- servation group after treatment was significantly higher than that of control group (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion Acupoint mas
分 类 号:R742[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.121.190