为何经验命题重要?——对维特根斯坦《论确定性》中经验命题概念的分析  

Why do Empirical Propositions Matter?

作　　者：李果[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学马克思主义学院哲学系

出　　处：《哲学研究》2016年第7期80-86,129,共7页Philosophical Research

摘　　要：维特根斯坦在《论确定性》之前,曾比较频繁地使用"哲学语法"或者"语法命题"等概念。但在《论确定性》中,"语法"这一概念出现的次数屈指可数,与此同时,经验命题与逻辑命题这样的概念却常被提及。本文试图分析经验命题与语法、逻辑命题等概念的复杂关联以及经验命题在《论确定性》文本中的重要地位。在这种理解中,我们还可以大致区分出两种经验命题,这对我们理解维特根斯坦的说服思想实验中的语言游戏演变甚至其晚期哲学都有着重要意义。Wittgenstein used to take philosophical grammar or grammatical proposition as important terms in his philosophical writings before the period of On Certainty. However,in his on Certainty,he seldom refers to even the broader concept of grammar; meanwhile, other concepts such as empirical proposition and logical proposition came up much more frequently. In this paper,I shall clarify the complicated relationships between grammar,logicalproposition and empiricalproposition. Then,the important role of empirical proposition in On Certainty would be located. In the light of the discussions above,local empirical propositions and universal empirical propositions could be inferred from the concept of empirical propositions,they are significant for us to understand the evolution of language-games in the persuasion thought experiment of On Certainty and Wittgenstein's latter philosophy as a whole.

关 键 词：经验命题 语法 逻辑命题 说服 维特根斯坦 

分 类 号：B561.5[哲学宗教—外国哲学]