战后国际冲突管理模式及其特点研究  

Study on the Mode and Feature of International Conflict Management after World War Ⅱ

作　　者：胡键[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海社会科学院

出　　处：《国际观察》2016年第4期113-127,共15页International Review

摘　　要：第二次世界大战结束后,联合国作为最权威的国际冲突管理机制一直在发挥着作用。但是,在冷战时期和冷战后时期,联合国的国际冲突管理模式与成效都有较大的区别。冷战期间,联合国被用以作为超级大国之间国际博弈的工具,同时也发挥着国际冲突管理的功能。除此之外,意识形态、战争技术等因素也是该时期国际冲突管理的重要工具。冷战结束后,国际冲突管理存在两种模式,一种是美国为维护其世界唯一霸权国的地位而采取的冲突管理模式,即霸权护持模式;另一种是要求国际权力公平分配的冲突管理模式,即民主模式。对这两个时期的国际冲突管理模式进行比较,可以发现:上述两个时期的国际冲突管理特点不同,成效也不一样;更为重要的是,冷战时期的国际冲突管理明显地优于冷战后时期。这无疑是一个值得深思的问题。After World War II, the United Nations as the most authoritative international mechanism always plays an active role. However, the intemational conflict management mode and its effect of the United Nations are quite different between the Cold War period and Post-cold War period. During the Cold War period, the United Nations was regarded as a tool of the game between super powers o The United Nations and factors like ideology, technology of war were also important tools for international conflict management. After the Cold War, there are two kinds of modes of international conflict management： the hegemonic maintenance mold and the democracy mold. The conflict management modes between the two periods are different in terms of management features and the effects. More importantly, the effect of international conflict management during the Cold War period is significantly better than that of the Post-cold War era. This is a question worth carefully pondering.

关 键 词：国际冲突管理 冷战时期 冷战后时期 冲突管理特点 

分 类 号：D815[政治法律—国际关系]