检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陆永健[1,2] 唐震[1] 龚璐璐[3] 李笑梅[1] 汪大林[1]
机构地区:[1]第二军医大学长海医院口腔科,上海200433 [2]上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院口腔科,上海200092 [3]同济大学生命科学与技术学院,上海200092
出 处:《第二军医大学学报》2016年第7期821-826,共6页Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University
基 金:上海市科学技术委员会科研计划项目(12ZR1438400)~~
摘 要:目的设计两种种植体支持式下颌半口全牙列固定义齿,研究在不同下颌骨垂直高度降低情况下种植体应力分布情况。方法利用锥束计算机断层扫描成像(CBCT)扫描下颌骨及上部义齿,形成下颌骨基准模型,将基准模型中下颌骨垂直高度分别下降0、5、10和15mm,组装种植体后,建立颏孔前6枚平行种植体支持和"All-on-four"支持的不同下颌骨垂直高度的种植体有限元模型,分别为6-种植体模型和4-种植体模型,共两组(8个)。在右下颌第一磨牙中央窝静态加载250N垂直力,用Ansys 15.0软件进行模型各部分的应力分析。结果在相同的加载条件下,种植体最大应力值位于颈部;两组8个模型最大应力值分布显示,不同下颌骨垂直高度下4-种植体组的最大应力值在40.12~49.06 MPa之间,6-种植体组的最大应力值在80.62~109.64MPa之间;6-种植体组的最大应力值是4-种植体组的2倍。两组模型中种植体最大应力在下颌骨垂直高度降低5mm时均表现为最低,随着下颌骨垂直高度降低,应力逐渐增大,而垂直高度下降0mm的模型最大应力要略大于下降5mm模型。结论 4-种植体和6-种植体支持的无牙颌固定义齿在相对极端的载荷下种植体都没有出现破坏性应力,4-种植体有着更加合理的应力分布;下颌骨垂直高度下降5mm组应力最小,说明适当降低垂直高度有利于种植体应力更加合理的分布。Objective To design two kinds of fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis and to investigate their stress distribution in the different vertical heights of the edentulous mandible.Methods The cone-beam computed tomography(CBCT)scan data of the upper denture and mandible were collected to establish the base models of the mandible.The vertical heights of the mandible models were lowered by 0,5,10 and 15 mm,and the three-dimensional finite element models of implants with different vertical heights supported by mental foramen 6parallel implants and supported by "All-on-Four"were established,including 2groups(8 models):6-implant group and 4-implant group.A 250 Nvertical force was applied to the central fossa of the right mandibular first molar.The stress of each part of the models was analyzed by Ansys 15.0software.Results Under the same loading condition,the maximum stress value of the implants was in the neck of the implants.The maximum stress distribution of 8models showed that the maximum stress value was 40.12-49.06 MPa for the 4-implant group and was 80.62-109.64 MPa for the 6-implant group,with the latter being two folds that of the former.In two groups,the maximum stress was the lowest when the vertical height reduction was 5mm.With the decrease of the mandible vertical height,the stress increased gradually.However,the maximum stress of the 0mm-height-reduced models was larger than that of 5mmheight-reduced models.Conclusion There is no destructive stress under certain extreme load in both 4-implant group and6-implant group,with the 4-implant group having a more reasonable stress distribution.The 5mm-hight-reduced models have the minimum stress,indicating that appropriate vertical height reduction can lead to more reasonable implant stress distribution.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222