检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄忠顺[1]
机构地区:[1]清华大学法学院,北京100084
出 处:《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2016年第4期169-178,共10页Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(14CFX028)"迈向制度理性的民事程序研究";教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(12JJD820012)"中国强制执行法体系研究"
摘 要:民事执行机构改革的初衷在于解决"执行难",但自上而下的改革实践偏向于司法腐败之防治和执行效率之提升,自下而上的改革试点则往往以多元政治利益诉求为驱动力。法院主导的民事执行机构改革不可避免地带有部门利益本位色彩,执行当事人在改革中缺乏有效的利益表达机制,学者对民事执行机构改革方案的论证应当始终坚持当事人中心主义。民事执行机构改革暂缓试点外分模式具备正当性基础,也符合司法改革的渐进性要求。当前法院主导的深化内分模式改革试点方案均以程序运行者为中心展开,并与现有民事诉讼制度存在诸多紧张关系,应从程序利用者的视角审视相关改革举措,并从解释论上为民事执行机构改革试点扫除制度性障碍。The original intention of the civil enforcement agency reform is to solve the Problems encountered in the process of compulsory execution. Reform measures adopted by the higher level courts are committed to preventing judicial corruption and improving execution efficiency. Reform measures adopted by the lower level courts are advanced with multiple political interests appeal as the driving force. The Reform of Civil Enforcement Agency led by the courts inevitably biased to protect their own interests,while enforcement parties have no clear interest expression mechanism. Therefore,scholars should always adhere to the Principle of "Taking Parties as the Center ",when demonstrating relevant reform plans. It is appropriate to postpone the pilot mode of establishing civil enforcement agencies outside the court system,and also in line with the gradual requirement of judicial reform. The current civil enforcement agency reform,led by the courts that operate the procedure,follows the practice of establishing civil enforcement agencies within the court,and puts their own interests before the parties. In order to resolve the conflict between the reform and the current system,from the perspective of the parities who use the procedure,this paper makes a comprehensive analysis on the reform of the civil enforcement agency,and cleans up the institutional barriers for reform by the method of legal interpretation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38