检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李旭[1,2] 李楠[3] 廖子君 李钟瑞 赵新汉[2]
机构地区:[1]陕西省肿瘤医院内一科,陕西西安710061 [2]西安交通大学医学院第一附属医院肿瘤内科,陕西西安710061 [3]西安市儿童医院神经外科,陕西西安710043
出 处:《现代肿瘤医学》2016年第13期2088-2092,共5页Journal of Modern Oncology
摘 要:目的:系统评价依托泊苷联合洛铂(EL)与依托泊苷联合顺铂(EP)治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌的有效性和安全性。方法:计算机检索Web of Knowledge、Pub Med、The Cochrane Library、CBM、CNKI、VIP及Wan Fang Data关于EL方案与EP方案治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌的随机对照研究(RCT)。依据Cochrane Handbook 5.0.1的质量评价标准进行RCT筛选、资料提取和质量评价后,采用Rev Man 5.2软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入4篇RCT研究,共计401例患者,Meta分析结果显示:在疗效方面,EL方案与EP方案相比,两者有效率差异无统计学意义[ORR=1.08,95%CI(0.53~2.21),P=0.82]。在安全性方面,EL方案与EP方案相比,Ⅲ-Ⅳ度消化道反应发生率差异具有统计学意义[OR=0.34,95%CI(0.20~0.58),P〈0.000 1]。而在Ⅲ-Ⅳ度白细胞减少[OR=0.77,95%CI(0.37~1.63),P=0.50],Ⅲ-Ⅳ度血小板减少[OR=2.81,95%CI(0.74~10.68),P=0.13],Ⅲ-Ⅳ度贫血[OR=0.47,95%CI(0.08~2.67),P=0.40]等方面差异无统计学意义。结论:EL方案在疗效方面与EP方案大致相当,EL方案消化道反应轻,患者耐受性好。Objective:To evaluate therapeutic efficacy and safety of etoposide plus lobaplatin versus etoposide plus cisplatin chemotherapy for extensive stage small cell lung cancer.Methods:We searched Web of Knowledge, PubMed,The Cochrane Library,CNKI,CBM,VIP and WanFang data base for randomized controlled trials comparing EL with EP regimens.Literatures were screened according to Cochrane Handbook 5.0.1 quality evaluation criteria. Meta -analysis was conducted with RevMan 5.2 software.Results:Four RCTs were included,involving 401 patients. The results of Meta -analyses showed that,in the aspect of efficacy,there was no significant difference between the two groups in the effective rate [ORR =1.08,95%CI(0.53 ~2.21),P =0.82].In the aspect of safety,there was significant difference between EL regimen and EP regimen in grade Ⅲ -Ⅳ nausea /vomiting [OR =0.34,95%CI (0.20 ~0.58),P〈0.000 1].There were no significant difference between the two groups in the grade Ⅲ -Ⅳ neu-tropenia [OR =0.77,95%CI(0.37 ~1.63),P =0.50],grade Ⅲ -Ⅳ thrombocytopenia[OR =2.81,95%CI(0.74~10.68),P =0.13],grade Ⅲ -Ⅳ anemia [OR =0.47,95%CI(0.08 ~2.67),P =0.40].Conclusion:EL has similar efficacy to EP for extensive stage small cell lung cancer patients,but it has fewer side effects of nausea/vomi-ting.It is well tolerant.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117