检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭丹丹[1] 苏宇[1] 彭凯[1] 余海洋 张亮[1] 熊巨洋[1]
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学同济医学院医药卫生管理学院,武汉430030 [2]国家中医药管理局,北京100027
出 处:《中国卫生经济》2016年第8期33-34,共2页Chinese Health Economics
基 金:国家中医药管理局项目"完善中医药事业发展政策与机制研究"(A-003);华中科技大学人文社科重点项目(0118516045)
摘 要:目的:探讨适合中医药特点的医保支付方式,为完善中医药医保支付制度提供依据。方法:采取实地调研与文献研究相结合的方法,分析目前医疗机构所采取的按项目付费、按病种付费及总额预付方式对中医服务的利用及中医药事业发展的影响。结果:我国目前的医保支付方式并不符合中医药的特点,其在一定程度上制约了中医药特色及优势的发挥。结论:基于"循证+价值"的观点,提出总额预付和按病种付费结合的符合中医药发展规律的中医药医保制度。Objective: To explore the medical insurance payment suitahle for the characteristics of Traditional Chinese Medi- cine(TCM), provide the basis for perfecting TCM health care payment system. Methods: Field study and literatnre research were ap- plied to analyze the influence of fee for service(FFS), diagnosis related groups(DRGs) and glohal budget on the utilization of TCM and the development of TCM industry. Results: The current medical payment method was not suitable for the characteristics of TCM, which restricted the features and advantages of TCM to some extent. Conclusion: Based on the view of "evidence-based and val- ue" , it put forward a TCM medical insurance system combined with global budget and DRGs which was suitable for TCM develop- ment regulation.
分 类 号:R197.1[医药卫生—卫生事业管理] F842.684[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3