城市发展指数和生态足迹在直辖市可持续发展评估中的应用  

The application of city development index and ecological footprint in the assessment of sustainable development of China's municipalities

作　　者：郭慧文[1] 严力蛟[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学生命科学学院生态研究所,杭州310058

出　　处：《生态学报》2016年第14期4288-4297,共10页Acta Ecologica Sinica

基　　金：浙江省科技厅科技攻关项目(2005C30013);国家科技支撑计划课题资助项目(2014BAL07B02)

摘　　要：综合应用城市发展指数(CDI)和生态足迹(EF)指标,分析各直辖市1978—2012年的可持续发展情况,衡量发展方式由资源消耗型向环境友好型转变的程度。研究表明:各直辖市的CDI不断增长,至2012年均达到80左右,基本处于同一层次水平,城市经济社会发展状况总体良好。EF的动态变化呈现阶段性发展的特点,各直辖市间也存在显著差异,除上海市,其他3个直辖市的EF呈现增长态势,至2012年,北京EF最高(2.60 hm2/人),重庆最低(1.79 hm^2/人),是唯一一个低于全国平均EF的直辖市。综合分析CDI和EF,在相似的社会经济发展水平下,重庆市的资源消耗较低,可持续发展潜力较大;天津市一直处于资源消耗型发展中,亟待转型;近十年来,上海和北京的城市建设模式出现了一定转变,由以消耗环境资源为代价的发展模式转变为环境友好型的发展模式。Indexes emphasize the correct direction of evolution and play the role of adjusting deviation, analyzing the patterns of evolution, and understanding influence. This paper, for the first time, used integrated application of City Development Index （CDI） and Ecological Footprint （EF） to analyze the status of sustainable development of China＇s municipalities during the 1978-2012 period. They were also used for the measurement of the transformation degrees of these municipalities＇ development from resource-consumption mode to environment-friendly mode. The results demonstrated that the CDI of each municipality has been increasing continuously. The CDI value of Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, and Chongqing were 86.25, 83.75, 70.60,and 79.83 respectively in 2012. Each municipality reached almost the same level 80 in 2012. Overall, city economic and social development conditions were both favorable. Although four municipalities＇ CDI value began at different levels and suffered from different growth rates, through more than 30 years of city construction, they reached almost the same destination. Compared with other cities＇ CDIs from around the world, the CDI value of China＇s municipalities ranked in the upper medium. Different from the variations in CDI values, variations in EF values showed the characteristics of stage development. There are significant differences among municipalities. In contrast to the EF value of Shanghai, the EF values of the other three municipalities presented a rising tendency. Since 2005, the EF value of Shanghai began to decline. Among the other three municipalities, the EF value of Beijing grew slowest, with a growth rate of about 14%, while the EF value of Tianjin grew fastest, with a growth rate of about 47%. The EF value of Beijing was highest （2.60 hm^2/cap）, while that of Chongqing was lowest （1.79 hm^2/cap）. Chongqing was the only municipality whose value stayed below the national average. After a comprehensive analysis of CDI and EF values to evaluate the status o

关 键 词：可持续发展 城市发展指数 生态足迹 直辖市 

分 类 号：X22[环境科学与工程—环境科学]