检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘彩凤[1,2]
机构地区:[1]山西医科大学,山西太原0300001 [2]大同市第五人民医院消化二科,山西大同037005
出 处:《山西大同大学学报(自然科学版)》2016年第3期51-52,73,共3页Journal of Shanxi Datong University(Natural Science Edition)
摘 要:目的探讨应用复方消化酶胶囊Ⅱ治疗餐后不适综合征型功能性消化不良的临床疗效。方法将确诊为餐后不适综合征型功能性消化不良的患者91例,随机分为对照组与治疗组,对照组42例患者给予口服伊托必利治疗,治疗组49例患者给予口服复方消化酶胶囊Ⅱ联合伊托必利治疗,治疗结束后比较2组的治疗效果。结果对照组的治疗总有效率为71.43%,治疗组的治疗总有效率为91.83%,治疗组疗效明显优于对照组,差异有显著性。2组治疗的副反应经治疗组统计学检验无显著性差异。结论复方消化酶胶囊Ⅱ治疗餐后不适综合征型功能性消化不良较单用伊托必利疗效明显改善,且副作用小,2药联合可获得更好的临床效果。Objective To investigate the clinical effect of compound digestive enzyme capsule II in the treatment of postprandial distress syndrome of functional dyspepsia. Methods 91 cases diagnosed postprandial distress syndrome patients in our hospital were randomly divided for control group and treatment group. 42 cases in control group were treated with itopride, while 49 cases in the treatment group were given capsule of compound digestive enzyme II combined with itopride treatment and after treatment were compared between the two groups of treatment effect. Results The total effective rate was 71.43% in the control group, the total effective rate was91.83% in the treatment group, the treatment group was significantly better than the control group, There was statistically difference in the two groups(P〈0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the side-effects(P〉0.05). Conclusions The method of using compound digestive enzyme II Capsule in treating postprandial distress syndrome type functional dyspepsia is more superior than single using itopride and side effects is small, The combination of two drugs can obtain better clinical effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117