钱钟书批评《文心雕龙》探究  

Criticisms of Wen Xin Diao Long by Qian Zhongshu

作　　者：何建委[1] 陆晓光[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学中国语言文学系,上海200062

出　　处：《新疆大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第4期106-111,共6页Journal of Xinjiang University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：《文心雕龙》作为我国著名文艺理论著作,钱钟书作为我国贯通古今中外的渊博通人,在学术界众所周知。然而,由于其主要学术著作《谈艺录》《七缀篇》《管锥编》侧重于古代典籍与诗歌,钱钟书对《文心雕龙》的批评,尤其是整体否定,虽耐人寻味,却鲜有人关注,很大程度上被"龙学"洪流所淹没。对此,有必要爬梳钱钟书对《文心雕龙》的认识与评价,考察其所折射的治学路径,及其相关所见之得失。As is known to all, Wen Xin Diao Long（Carving a Dragon at the Core of Literature） is the best-known theory of literature and art in China and Qian Zhongshu is a master in the study of Chinese literature. However, few people have paid attention to the total negation of Wen Xin Diao Long by Qian Zhongshu, for his representative works,such as Notes on Literature, Qi Zhui Pian and Guan Zhui Pian focused on ancient books and poetry. This paper reviewed different comments by Qian Zhongshu in order to investigate his academic studies and probe into his achievements.

关 键 词：钱钟书 《文心雕龙》 批评 探究 

分 类 号：I02[文学—文学理论]