检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《浙江临床医学》2016年第9期1676-1677,共2页Zhejiang Clinical Medical Journal
摘 要:目的探讨热牙胶根管填充在根管治疗中的应用价值。方法牙根管治疗患者100例(108颗患牙),随机分为两组。观察组50例(55颗患牙)应用热牙胶技术充填,对照组50例(53颗患牙)应用冷牙胶侧压技术填充,比较两组患者操作时间、填充效果及临床疗效。结果观察组操作时间、填充效果及临床疗效均明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈O.05)。结论热牙胶根管填充行根管治疗具有时间短、填充效果及临床疗效好等优点,可提高工作效率及临床疗效。Objective To observe the clinical value of hot gutta-percha filling in teeth root canal treatment ( RCT ) . Methods 100 RCT patients with 108 teeth were collected and randomly divided into two groups. The observation group with 50 RCT patients ( 55 teeth ) was treated with hot gutta-percha filling method, while the control group with 50 RCT patients ( 53 teeth ) was treated with cold gutta-percha filling method. Then chairside operation time, filling quality and clinical effects between the two groups were compared. Results The chairside operation time, filling quality and clinical effects of the observation group were significantly better than the control group, the differences were statistically significant ( P〈0.05 ) . Conclusions The hot gutta-percha filling treatment shows less chairside operation time, better filling quality and could improve the clinical effect significantly.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145