检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]郑州大学附属洛阳中心医院胸外科,河南洛阳471000
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2016年第18期229-230,共2页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的探究早期营养护理干预在肺癌患者术后的应用效果及对其免疫功能的影响。方法选取我院收治的74例肺癌患者,随机分组,各37例。研究组于术后48 h内实施早期营养护理干预,对照组于48 h后实施营养护理干预。统计两组患者免疫功能指标、营养指标。结果研究组IgG(1.8±0.4)g/L、IgA(12.8±1.8)g/L高于对照组IgG(1.3±0.5)g/L、IgA(10.2±1.5)g/L,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组前白蛋白、血清蛋白均高于对照组,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对肺癌患者术后实施早期营养护理干预可促进患者免疫功能恢复,改善营养状况,在临床治疗中具有重要意义。Objective To explore the effect of early nutrition nursing intervention on postoperative patients with lung cancer and its effect on immune function. Methods 74 cases of lung cancer patients in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups, and each group had 37 cases. The study group in the 48 hours after was given the implementation of early nutrition nursing intervention, and the control group was given the implementation of nutritional care intervention for 48 h. The immune function and nutritional index of the two groups were analyzed. Results Study group IgG (1.8±0.4) g/L, IgA (12.8±1.8) g/L was higher than the control group IgG (1.3±0.5) g/L, IgA (10.2±1.5) g/L, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P〈0.05).The pre albumin and serum protein in the study group were all higher than those in the control group, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P〈0.05). Conclusion For lung cancer patients after the implementation of early nutrition nursing intervention can promote the recovery of immune function, to improve the nutritional status, has important significance in clinical treatment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15