检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《情报杂志》2016年第8期65-70,75,共7页Journal of Intelligence
摘 要:[目的/意义]为了明确目前我国高校的办学类型,探究整体规律。[方法/过程]采用计量学和社会网络分析方法,以全国112所"211工程"大学为例,对其类型划分进行了研究,从多维尺度、凝聚子群二个层面对"211"大学进行了分析。[结果/结论]结果显示当前官方给出的211大学类型划分,大部分与其专业设置相符,少数大学受区域因素、新时期定位等原因产生了偏离,教学范围与其类型不符。根据高校专业范畴,建议将大学重新划分为文科综合型、理科综合型、文理综合型和单一特色型。[ Purpose/Significance] In order to clarify the current college education type, as well as to explore the overall characteristic. [ Method/Process] in this paper, the types of 112 universities of "211 projects" are studied as an example with the method of bibliometrics and social network analysis. [ Result/Conclusion] After analyzing the 211 universities respectively from the levels of multidimensional scaling and condensing subgroup, we draw the conclusion that most of the university types given by the official is appropriate, while a small number of universities have been unable to determine its type according to the scope of the discipline. Based on the professional category, it is suggested that the universities were re-classified into liberal comprehensive type, polytechnic comprehensive type, comprehensive type and characteristic type.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249