夏承焘词史观与词史建构评述  

A Critical Review of Xia Chengtao's Views on the History of Ci-Poetry and the Construction of the History

作　　者：钱志熙[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学中文系

出　　处：《文艺理论研究》2016年第3期46-67,共22页Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art

摘　　要：夏承焘的词史观与词史建构,是其词学研究与词体创作两方面实践的产物。夏氏词史观以力破婉约正宗论为基本特点,打破千年以来词史的定局,从更大的文学史与文体背景上论词史,对传统的婉约、豪放两分法多有辨析。其中对常州词派词史观的反思、对文人词个体抒情传统的揭示、对诗词界限的辩证思考、不破词体、不诬词体等观点,都具有重要的学术价值。夏氏词史观与词史建构融会新旧,也反映了二十世纪复杂多变的学术背景,但始终坚持学术自身的立场,在二十世纪词学研究中占有重要位置,并对此后的词史研究有很大的启发,对于今后的词史建构也有重要的参考价值。Xia Chengtao＇s views on the history of ci-poetry and the construction of the history resulted from his research and creative practice. One of Xia＇s key views was that the delicate restraint style was not to be termed as the orthodox, and this view broke away from the established understanding in the history of ci-poetry and enables Xia to reflect from a broader context on the ci-poetry history and the dualistic classification of ci-poetry. Xia＇s reflection on Changzhou School＇s view of ci-poetry history was of special importance to his views. His contributions to the study of ci-poetry included his elucidation of the individualistic lyrical tradition of literati poets, his argumentation on the boundary between ci-poetry and shi-poetry, and his claims of not breaking down or playing down the style of ci-poetry. Xia could both inherit the ancient ideas and absorb the new ideas to develop his own ideas and his non-conformist academic standpoint also made him a unique voice in the history of ci-poetry criticism and study.

关 键 词：夏承焘 词学 词史观 词史建构 

分 类 号：I207.23[文学—中国文学]