检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《精神医学杂志》2016年第3期199-201,共3页Journal of Psychiatry
基 金:山东省医药卫生科技发展计划项目(编号:2013WS0156)
摘 要:目的了解精神科护士人格特征现状及其与应对方式的相关性。方法采用一般资料问卷、艾森克人格问卷(EPQ)、简易应对方式量表(SCSQ)对山东省6家精神病专科医院的813名精神科护士进行调查。结果精神科护士积极应对方式评分高于国内常模(P<0.05);消极应对方式评分低于国内常模(P<0.05)。应对方式各因子与人格特征各维度有不同程度的相关性(P<0.05)。多元逐步回归分析结果显示,精神质、神经质、内-外向维度、学历对积极应对方式有预测作用(P<0.05),精神质、神经质、掩饰性维度对消极应对方式有预测作用(P<0.05)。结论精神科护士面对应激时,不同人格特征的护士会采取不同应对方式,人格特征对应对方式有一定的预测作用。Objective To explore the personality characteristics in psychiatric nurses and its correlation with coping style. Methods 813 psychiatric nurses in 6 psychiatric hospitals in Shandong Province were recruited and assessed with general information questionnaire, Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ) and Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ). Results Compared with the norms, psychiatric nurses showed significant higher factor scores in positive coping style and lower factor scores in negative coping style ( P 〈 0.05 ). All factor scores in SCSQ were correlated with all dimensions in EPQ ( P 〈 0.05 ). Multiple stepwise regression analysis showed that P, N, E and educational background were significant predictors for positive coping style, while P, N and L were significant predictors for negative coping style ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion Psychiatric nurses with different personality characteristics tend to take different coping styles when facing stresses. Personality characteristics have prediction effect on coping styles to some extent.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28