检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江省宁波镇海区炼化医院,宁波315207 [2]浙江省宁波镇海龙赛医院
出 处:《浙江创伤外科》2016年第4期624-626,共3页Zhejiang Journal of Traumatic Surgery
基 金:宁波市镇海区科技局科技项目(2012S1003)
摘 要:目的比较新型国产n-HA和法国碧兰公司生产Cortisomol两种糊剂在一次性根管治疗术后的临床效果。方法对本院门诊收治的适应一次性根管治疗术的153名患者,共221颗患牙,随机分为两组,分别采用Cortisomol糊剂加牙胶尖与n-HA糊剂加牙胶尖这两种根管充填材料进行一次性根管充填,并对两组术后7天、1年的临床疗效进行比较分析。结果治疗后7天术后疼痛反应率Cortisomol糊剂组较n-HA糊剂组略低,但无明显差异(P>0.05),1年的成功率n-HA糊剂组较Cortisomol糊剂组高,但无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论 nHA糊剂和Cortisomol糊剂均为目前较理想的一次性根充材料。Objective To compare Cortisomol paste and n-HA paste in the postoperative pain and the therapeutic effects of one-visit root canal treatment. Methods 153 patients(221teeth)who required root canal filling therapy were recruited and randomly divided into Cortisomol paste group (107 teeth) and n-HA paste paste group (114 teeth) plus gutta-percha. The pain intensity was evaluated within 1 week,and the therapeutic ef- fects were assessed after 1 year. Results 1 to 7 days after treatment,the pain intensity in Cortisomol paste group was slightly lower than that in n- HA paste group, but the difference had no statistical significance (P〉0.05),and the n-HA paste group showed better effect in periapical periodontitis patients than that in Cortisomol paste group, but the difference had no statistical significance (P〉0.05). Conclusion Cortisomol paste and n-HA pastes are currently ideal disposable root filling material,
关 键 词:CORTISOMOL糊剂 n-HA糊剂 一次性根管治疗
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.248