审判中心、庭审实质化与刑事司法改革——基于庭审实录和裁判文书的实证研究  

Trial-centeredness,Substantiation of Court Hearing and the Reform of Criminal Justice System:An Empirical Research on Court Records and Judgment Documents in China

作　　者：胡铭[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学光华法学院

出　　处：《法学家》2016年第4期16-27,175-176,共12页The Jurist

基　　金：国家"2011计划"司法文明协同创新中心;国家社科基金重点项目"中国特色社会主义司法制度的模式;规律与改革方向研究"(14AKS009)成果

摘　　要：审判中心主义要求裁判者亲历审理和证据审查过程,依据当庭提供并经过控辩质证的证据作出裁判,侦查等审前程序需要为此作出调整,从而使刑事司法围绕审判展开,并使侦查、控诉、辩护、审判四方关系发生变化。实证分析显示,我国刑事诉讼仍带有显著的案卷笔录中心主义色彩,这背后又是侦查中心主义的刑事诉讼构造。应以新刑事诉讼法实施和司法改革为契机,围绕对质权保障推动庭审实质化,从证明力切入逐渐限制证据能力,完善分工配合制约原则,渐次展开审判中心主义之改革,以实现刑事司法中看得见的正义。The criminal trial is both the core of modern criminal justice and the focus of the judicial reform.Under the trial-centeredness,judges preside over the hearing process and the evidence examination.They should give judgment according to the evidence given in court and cross-examined by the two sides.To this end,some pretrial procedures like criminal investigation need to be adjusted,in order to carry out the process of criminal justice revolving around the criminal trial,together with the variation of the foursquare-investigation,prosecution,defense and judgment.Based on the empirical analysis,criminal procedure in China still has a strong character of file transcript centralism,behind which lays the criminal litigation structure of investigation-centeredness.China should use the new Criminal Procedure Law and the judicial reform to realize the substantiation of court hearing centered protection of pledge,gradual restriction of evidence credibility through the probative force.In the meantime,the principle of individual responsibility and mutual coordination and supervision should be perfected and the reform of trial-centeredness should also be fulfilled progressively.Finally comes the 'visible justice' in criminal justice.

关 键 词：审判中心主义 庭审实质化 司法职权配置 刑事司法改革 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]