共刺激分子CD_(80)和CD_(86)表达对鼻咽癌进展及预后的影响研究  被引量:5

Influence of CD_(80) and CD_(86) Expression on Progression and Prognosis of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:蔡曼波[1] 冯启胜[2] 陈丽珍[2] 邵建永[2] 曾益新[2] 

机构地区:[1]南华大学附属第一医院放疗科,湖南省衡阳市421001 [2]中山大学肿瘤防治中心华南肿瘤重点实验室

出  处:《中国全科医学》2016年第22期2686-2690,共5页Chinese General Practice

基  金:国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)资助项目(2013CB910301;2011CB504302);湖南省自然科学基金资助项目(S2016J504B);湖南省卫生厅项目(B2014-051)

摘  要:背景CD(80)和CD(86)是T淋巴细胞活化的重要共刺激分子,肿瘤细胞可通过低表达或缺失共刺激分子发生免疫逃逸。目的探讨共刺激分子CD(80)和CD(86)表达对鼻咽癌进展和预后的影响。方法选取2001年1月—2003年12月经中山大学肿瘤防治中心病理科诊断为鼻咽癌并有相应临床随访资料的鼻咽癌组织标本557例。患者均初次诊断且未进行任何治疗,随访时间2~114个月,随访过程中发生转移113例,死亡235例。采用免疫组织化学法检测CD(80)和CD(86)表达,采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线、Log-rank检验及单因素Cox比例风险回归分析探讨CD(80)和CD(86)表达与鼻咽癌患者进展及预后的关系。结果免疫组织化学法发现,CD(80)和CD(86)主要定位在细胞膜上,在肿瘤间质很少表达。557例患者中CD(80)低表达组309例,CD(80)高表达组248例;CD(86)低表达组470例,CD(86)高表达组87例。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线和Log-rank检验结果显示,CD(80)低表达组与CD(80)高表达组鼻咽癌患者无瘤生存时间比较,差异无统计学意义(χ~2=3.551,P=0.060);CD(80)低表达组与CD(80)高表达组鼻咽癌患者总生存时间比较,差异有统计学意义(χ~2=5.521,P=0.019)。CD(86)低表达组与CD(86)高表达组鼻咽癌患者无瘤生存时间及总生存时间比较,差异无统计学意义(χ~2=0.948,P=0.330;χ~2=0.662,P=0.416)。单因素Cox比例风险回归分析结果显示,CD(80)高表达组鼻咽癌患者发生转移复发及死亡的风险高于CD(80)低表达组(P〈0.05);CD(86)低表达组与CD(86)高表达组鼻咽癌患者发生转移复发及死亡的风险比较,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。Spearman秩相关分析结果显示,鼻咽癌组织中CD(86)表达与间质中CD68+巨噬细胞数量呈正相关(rs=0.103,P=0.015)。结论鼻咽癌组织中CD(80)高表达与鼻咽癌患者预后差有关,增加局部�Background CD_(80) and CD_(86)costimulatory molecules have an important role in T cell activation. Low or loss expression of CD_(80) and CD_(86)may lead to the occurrence of tumor immune escape. Objective To investigate the influence of CD_(80) and CD_(86)expression on the progression and prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma( NPC). Methods 557 cases,who were diagnosed with nasopharyngeal carcinoma from January 2001 to December 2003 in Sun Yat- Sen University Cancer Center were selected in this study. The cases were pathologically confirmed diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with biopsy specimens of corresponding clinical follow- up data. Patients were first diagnosed with NPC without any treatment. During the 2 to 114 months follow- up period,113 patients had distant organ metastasis,235 cases occurred to death. Immunohistochemical method was applied to detect CD_(80) and CD_(86)expression; Kaplan- Meier survival curve,the Log- rank test and single factor Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were adopted to analyze the relationship between the CD_(80) and CD_(86)expression and the progression and the prognosis of NPC patients. Results Immunohistochemical method found that CD_(80) and CD_(86)were mainly expressed in tumor cell membrane surface,but little expressed in tumor stroma. Among the 557 patients,309 cases in the low expression group of CD_(80),248 in the high expression group of CD_(80); 470 cases in the low expression group of CD_(86),87 in the high expression group of CD_(86). Kaplan- Meier survival curve and the Log- rank test results showed that there was no significant difference in the disease- free survival time between NPC patients in low expression group and high expression group of CD_(80)( χ~2= 3. 551,P = 0. 060);and there was significant difference in the overall survival time between NPC patients in low expression group and high expression group of CD_(80)( χ~2= 5. 521,P = 0. 019). There were no s

关 键 词:鼻咽肿瘤 抗原 CD80 抗原 CD86 预后 

分 类 号:R739.6[医药卫生—肿瘤]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象