检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:景生华[1] 杨孝伟[1] 许诺[1] 彭家华[1] 朱锡旭[1] 李兵[1]
出 处:《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》2016年第9期968-970,共3页Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
摘 要:目的分析不同数量的金标在射波刀放疗中的区别,阐述金标追踪在射波刀临床治疗中的优势。方法整理和分析2013-2014年间进行射波刀金标追踪治疗的患者424例,其中观察组330例(≥3个金标追踪),对照组94例(〈3个金标追踪),记录并分析每例患者的摆位误差数据和治疗误差数据。结果观察组摆位误差平均值0.031mm,治疗误差平均值0.314mm;对照组摆位误差平均值0.057mm,治疗误差平均值1.122mm。结论采用≥3个金标追踪能明显提高患者的治疗精确度,提高治疗质量。Objective To analyze the differences between CyberKnife radiotherapy with different numbers of gold markers. Methods A total of 424 patients undergoing CyberKnife with gold markers from 2013 to 2014 were enrolled and analyzed. In these patients, 330 patients with no less than 3 gold markers were assigned to observation group and 94 patients with less than 3 gold markers were assigned to control group. The setup error and treatment error were recorded and analyzed for each patient. Results The mean setup error and mean treatment error were 0. 031 mm and 0. 314 mm in the observation group and 0. 057 mm and 1. 122 mm in the control group, respectively. Conclusion Tracking no less than 3 gold markers can substantially improve the accuracy and quality of treatment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117