检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢晓[1,2]
机构地区:[1]南京大学法学院,江苏南京210093 [2]西北政法大学民商法学院,陕西西安710063
出 处:《医学与哲学(A)》2016年第9期72-76,共5页Medicine & Philosophy:Humanistic & Social Medicine Edition
基 金:2014年度西安市法学会重点课题;项目编号:201408
摘 要:现有的医疗纠纷处理机制难以有效化解矛盾;而仲裁具有中立、专业、经济等优势,可以适用于该领域。考察我国目前存在的医疗纠纷仲裁试点情况、参考劳动争议及土地承包纠纷仲裁之得失,科学合理地设置医疗纠纷仲裁制度:利用现有的仲裁机制,增设医学专家作为备选仲裁员,负责鉴定医疗行为正当性和裁决医疗侵权责任,实行自愿仲裁、一裁终局,给医患双方提供诉讼外化解矛盾的新选择,并减轻法院审理该类案件在专业知识和数量上的巨大压力。The current settlement of medical disputes is in effective. The arbitration system is characterized as economic, convenient and neutral, which can be used in the medical field. Based on the present situation of the experimental implement and the reference of the gains & losses on the labor dispute arbitration and the rural contracted land disputes arbitration, we should set up a scientific and rational medical dispute arbitration system, including setting up a medical expert list as arbitrator who is responsible for handling medical disputes, voluntary arbitration pattern, free arbitration, and so on. It is important to provide a new choice of litigation to resolve contradictions between patients and doctors, in order to decrease the courts' pressure.
分 类 号:R05[医药卫生] D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.87