检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张建宇[1] 丁涤非[2] 周玉凤[1] 曹海英[1] 刘永新[1] 洪君[1]
机构地区:[1]中国人民解放军第八二医院肿瘤科,江苏淮安223001 [2]中国人民解放军第一二三医院肿瘤科,安徽蚌埠233010
出 处:《徐州医学院学报》2016年第8期520-522,共3页Acta Academiae Medicinae Xuzhou
摘 要:目的利用X射线容积图像(X—rayvolumeimage,XVI)技术分析食管胸中段癌放疗中的摆位误差大小,并据此计算出临床靶区体积外放值(marginclinicaltargetvolume,MCTV)。方法54例食管胸中段癌患者,均接受三维适形放射治疗(3-dimensionalconformalradiationtherapy,3D—CRT)或调强放射治疗(intensitymodulatedradiationtherapy,IMRT),每位患者治疗前均用XVI技术采集图像,疗程中每周随机扫描2次,连续采集3周,即每位患者共采集6幅图像。将重建扫描图像与治疗计划cT扫描图像相配准,得出当次患者x(左右)、Y(头脚)、z(腹背)三个方向上的摆位误差,进行在线移床校准,记录校准前后三个方向的摆位误差。根据vanHerk提出的MCTV公式(MCTV=2.5∑+0.7σ)进行计算。结果54例患者共扫描324幅图像。校准前x、Y、z三个方向的摆位误差分别为(-0.01±1.12)mm、(0.74±3.47)mm、(-0.82±1.26)mm,校准后x、Y、z三个方向的摆位误差分别为(-0.01±0.42)mm、(0.08±0.61)mm、(-0.02-e0.35)mm;不应用XVI技术时MCTV在X、Y、Z三个方向的值分别为4.16mm、9.42Bin、4.47nlm,应用XVI技术时MCTV在x、Y、z三个方向的值分别为1.38mm、1.62mm、1.39mm。结论对食管胸中段癌患者在治疗前应用XVI技术校准,可以减小人为摆位误差,缩小MCTV,从而减小放疗计划靶区体积。Objective To analyze the positioning errors of mid - thoracic esophageal carcinoma radiotherapy using X -ray volume image (XVI) and calculate margin clinical target volume (MCTV). Methods A total of 54 patients with mid - thoracic esophageal carcinoma were enrolled into the current study. They underwent either 3 - dimensional confor- real radiation therapy (3D -CRT) or intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Their images were collected using XVI before treatment. Each patient was randomly scanned twice per week for three consecutive weeks, with 6 images for each one in total. Then, reconstructed scanning images were matched with CT scanning images, and the positioning er- rors in the three directions X (left and right) , Y (head and foot) , and Z (abdomen and back) were obtained. The on- line moving bed calibration was carried out and the resultant positioning errors in the three directions were recorded. The outer area was calculated according to the following equation: MCTV=2.5∑+0.7σ. Results There were a total of 324 images for all patients. Before calibration, the positioning errors of the X, Y, Z directions were ( -0. 01 ±1.12) mm, (0.74 ± 3.47) mm and ( - 0.82 ± 1.26) ram, respectively. After calibration, the positioning errors of the X, Y, Z directions were ( -0.01 ±0.42) ram, (0.08 -0.6) mm and ( -0.02 ±0.35) mm. Without XVI, the MCTV of the X, Y, Z directions were 4.16 mm, 9.42 mm and 4.47 ram. Using XVI, the MCTV of the X, Y, Z directions were 1. 38 mm, 1.62 mm and 1.39 mm. Conclusions XVI - based calibration before treatment can be applied for mid - tho- racic esophageal carcinoma patients. With reduced positioning errors and smaller MCTV, this approach can decrease the volume of the planning target area.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249