检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李祥秀[1] 谭平[2] 刘良坤[3] 张颖[2] 周福霖[2,3] 李小军[1]
机构地区:[1]中国地震局地球物理研究所,北京100081 [2]广州大学工程抗震研究中心,广州510405 [3]北京工业大学建筑工程学院,北京100124
出 处:《工程力学》2016年第9期76-84,共9页Engineering Mechanics
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(51608491;51208475;51208129);长江学者和创新团队发展计划项目(IRT13057);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务专项项目(DQJB15B11)
摘 要:为了研究巨-子结构控制体系的抗震性能,该文进行了巨-子结构控制体系的振动台试验研究。试验模型均为钢框架模型且包括三个不同的模型,分别称为抗震结构模型、隔震结构模型和隔震-底层固结模型。采用大型有限元软件SAP2000对试验模型进行了非线性时程分析,并在主结构的加速度、层间位移,子结构的层间位移以及隔震层的变形方面与试验结果进行了对比分析。结果表明:理论分析与试验研究结果吻合较好,且不论是理论计算结果还是试验实测结果,隔震结构以及隔震-底层固结结构相对于抗震结构而言,结构的响应减小明显,说明结构施加隔震装置后能有效减小结构响应,从而保证结构的安全性。Shaking table test of the mega-sub control system was carried out in order to study the seismic performance of this system. Test specimens were 3 steel frames, called aseismic model, isolated model and isolated-bottom consolidated model, respectively. Nonlinear dynamic time analyses of the test models were performed using SAP2000. Theoretical results were compared with the experimental results on some structural responses including the acceleration response and story drift response of the mega-structure, the story drift response of the substructure, and the deformation of the isolation layer. The results shows that theoretical analysis are in good agreement with the experimental results. The structural responses of the isolated model and isolated-bottom consolidated model are greatly reduced compared with that of the aseismic model, which can be illustrated by both the theoretical results and experimental results. It is concluded that the isolation devices can reduce the structural responses effectively, and make the structure safer than that without isolation devices.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117