检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵德关[1]
机构地区:[1]上海市人民政府法制办公室行政复议处
出 处:《行政法学研究》2016年第5期75-84,共10页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
摘 要:新《行政诉讼法》关于复议共同被告的规定影响巨大,它部分解决了长久以来存在的行政复议制度定位争议问题,同时也对行政复议产生了较大冲击和不利影响。为解决上述困境,应当将行政复议定位为"替代性行政争议裁决制度"。在此基础上,结合《行政复议法》的修订,从职能、组织、受案范围、审查方式等方面对行政复议制度进行改革。The new Administrative Procedure Law leaves much impact considering the coaccused. It provides a partial solution to the long existed of administrative reconsideration system positioning controversial issue, meanwhile it brings a greater impact and adverse effects to the administrative reconsideration. To solve this dilemma, the administrative reconsideration should be positioned as ‘an alternative administrative dispute ruling system'. Based on this, connecting with the revision of the Administrative Review Law, related reforms should be done on administrative reconsideration in terms of its functions, organization, scope of the case, the review mode, etc.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.123