检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]厦门大学管理学院,厦门361005
出 处:《管理科学学报》2016年第9期49-66,共18页Journal of Management Sciences in China
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71371158;71671151)
摘 要:构建了3种基于以旧换新策略的闭环供应链决策模型,包括集中决策模型(C)、制造商销售第三方回收商回收模型(M3P)、零售商销售第三方回收商回收模型(R3P),并分别讨论了模型的最优定价与回收策略.通过理论与数值分析表明:制造商和整个供应链系统所获得的利润方面,模型C优于模型M3P,而模型M3P优于模型R3P;而第三方回收商所获得的利润方面,模型M3P也优于模型R3P;此外,根据产品全生命周期评估方法进行环境绩效分析,结果表明在环境绩效的表现上不存在具有绝对优势的模型.This paper develops three decision models cluding the centralized decision model (model C ), for closed-loop supply chains(CLSC) with trade-ins, in- the manufacturer selling and the third-party collecting model (model M3P), and the retailer selling and the third-party collecting model (model R3P), and investi- gates the optimal pricing and collection strategies for each model. The theoretical analysis and numerical ex- periments show that, in terms of the profits obtained by the manufacturer and the whole supply chain, model C dominates model M3P and model M3P dominates model R3P; in terms of the third-party collector's profits, model M3P dominates model R3P. However, in terms of environmental performance, none of them dominates the others according to the life-cycle assessment methodology.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.158