从“反本质主义”到“强制阐释论”——中国当代文艺学的“本质论”迷失及其理论突围  

From the“Anti-essentialism”to the“Theory of Peremptory Interpretation”——The Lost of the“Essence Theory”about Chinese Contemporary Literary Theory and it's Theoretical Breakthrough

作　　者：单小曦[1] 

机构地区：[1]杭州师范大学人文学院

出　　处：《山东大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第5期94-102,共9页Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"当代数字媒介场中的文学生产方式变革研究"(10CZW011)

摘　　要：中国当代文艺学的理论争鸣基本属于"本质论"范式之中的内部矛盾。"反本质主义"主张超越"本质主义"并以"建构主义"、"关系主义"、"穿越主义"等理论模式开展中国当代文艺学的建设工作,但总体上仍未脱离"本质论"文艺学范畴。而"强制阐释论"反思批判了当代西方文论,将其问题归结为"强制阐释",提出以"本体阐释"代替"强制阐释",但在其反对"强制阐释"和主张"本体阐释"的理论根部也深埋着"本质论"的基本观念。中国当代文艺学要获得突破性发展需要走出"本质论"范式的理论怪圈,建构现代存在论文艺学可以作为中国当代文艺学发展建设的一种选择。The theoretical debates of Chinese contemporary literary theory are based on the inner contradiction about the ＂essence theory＂ paradigm. The ＂Anti-essentialism＂ makes a claim to surpass the ＂Essentialism＂ and to carry out the construction work of Chinese contemporary literary theory by the theoretical model about the ＂Construetivism＂, ＂Relationalism＂, ＂Time-travelism＂ and so on. But they still haven＇t transcended the category of ＂Essence theory＂ literary theory in the whole. The ＂theory of Peremptory Interpretation＂ criticized western contemporary literary theories, which interpreted literature peremptorily by the way of ＂Off-site requisition＂ and ＂Subjective presenting＂, and proposed to explain literature with ＂Ontological Interpretation＂. However, during interpreting the ＂Peremptory interpretation＂ and the ＂Ontological interpretation＂, it adhered to the basic concept of the literary ＂Essence theory＂. If Chinese contemporary literary theory wants to achieve the significant breakthrough, it needs to be out of the theoretical circles of the ＂Essence theory＂ paradigm. It can be one of the choices that construct the modern Ontology literary theory as the way to develop and construct Chinese contemporary literary theory.

关 键 词：反本质主义 强制阐释论 “本质论”范式 现代存在论文艺学 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]