论庭前会议中律师的终止诉讼动议之理论可行性  

The Motions of Lawyer Litigation Stay in Pre-Trial Motions

作　　者：祁亚平[1] 

机构地区：[1]甘肃政法学院法学院,甘肃兰州730070

出　　处：《哈尔滨师范大学社会科学学报》2016年第3期60-64,共5页Journal of Social Science of Harbin Normal University

基　　金：甘肃省高等学校科研规划项目(J13LN77)

摘　　要：按照刑诉法的规定,庭前会议完全是法官依职权召开的庭审准备程序。笔者认为,庭前会议不应当是单方主体的职权程序。庭前会议作为庭审的准备程序,必然是控辩审三方共同参与的程序。律师应当有权提请召开审前会议,应当有权提请法官裁决是否有必要进行本案的正式审判。从阶段上来讲,庭前会议在从法院程序性审查之后到庭审召开之间。辩护律师在庭前会议中阻止不必要的庭审是辩护人必须具备的权利,将滥用权力的指控阻止于审判开始之前是真正的辩护。After the preliminary hearing and before a criminal case goes to trial, the prosecutor and the defense attorney usually appear before a criminal court judge and make pre - trial motions--arguments that certain evidence should be kept out of the trial, that certain persons must or cannot testify, or that the case should be dismissed altogether, pre - trial motions are requests made by either attorney prior to the trial to lim- it the amount of evidence a jury or judge will hear. Pre - trial motions are tools used by the government and the defense in an effort to set the boundaries for trial, should one take place.

关 键 词：诉讼终止 庭前会议 动议 

分 类 号：D925[政治法律—诉讼法学]