浅析米德的语言姿势起源观  

Mead's Gestural Theory of Language Origin

作　　者：杨波[1] 吴文[1] 

机构地区：[1]长江师范学院外国语学院,重庆408100

出　　处：《浙江外国语学院学报》2016年第5期1-4,13,共5页Journal of Zhejiang International Studies University

基　　金：国家社科基金西部项目(12XYY011)

摘　　要：在继承与批判达尔文和冯特有关"姿势"概念的前提下,米德在社会互动层面提出"姿势具有社会性"。米德认为当行动的表现具有企图招致其他某种反应的目的或期望时,姿势(行动与反应)就包含了意义的意识,故而将姿势发展为惯例性的姿势,即"有意义的符号"。米德认为人类是在社会互动中通过姿势对话逐渐衍生出语言的。然而,米德不企图寻求语言起源的历史根源或其产生的可能条件,而是在人类日常生活中找寻其经验来源,因此他的语言姿势起源观存在诸多不足之处。Based on the definition of gesture proposed by Charles Darwin and Wilhelm Wundt, George Herbert Mead regarded gesture as a social symbol, which is understood as a significant symbol when it is used for response intention. Mead assumed that language is originated from the gesture. George Herbert Mead would not like to probe into the origination of language from its historical situation, and only explained it from human daily experience;so his theory of language origin has some disadvantages.

关 键 词：米德 语言起源 姿势 姿势对话 

分 类 号：H0-05[语言文字—语言学]