我国公诉案件程序变更之正当性研究  

On the Due Process of the Action Changing in the Public Prosecution

作　　者：娄超[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学诉讼制度与司法改革研究中心,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《政法论丛》2016年第5期124-132,共9页Journal of Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社会科学基金后期资助项目"造法性司法解释研究"(2012FX032);国家"2011"司法文明协同创新中心资助项目的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：我国公诉案件变更程序缺乏有效的规则约束和制度规范,应当在明确公诉案件程序变更的理论基础是不告不理原则、控审职能分立、以审判为中心、诉审客体同一、禁止双重危险原则的前提下,以刑事诉讼客体理论为指导,以必要性原则和限度原则为指引,规范和完善我国公诉案件程序变更的时限、主体、范围等,增设公诉变更程序的审查与救济机制,通过严格的程序限制来实现我国公诉案件程序变更制度的正当性。The procedure of prosecutorial changing action in China lacks effective restrictions and implementation.On the theory basis that concluded No Trial Without Complaint, The principle of Separation Between the Accusation and the Judiciary, the object on trial should be equal to the prosecution content, centering on judgment, and the Double Jeopardy doctrine, the due process of prosecutorial changing action requests more strict or more rigorous regulations on the applicants, the deadline and the scope of which can be allowed to change public prosecuting cases. It is necessary to establish the judicial review and remedy system under the guidance of necessity principle and limitation principle.

关 键 词：公诉变更 正当性 诉讼客体 辩护权 

分 类 号：DF718[政治法律—诉讼法学]