检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王董冬 殷捷[1] 吴勤奋[1] 莫拉丁[1] 孙敦新[1]
机构地区:[1]中国人民解放军第474医院神经外科,乌鲁木齐830013
出 处:《新疆医学》2016年第8期1014-1015,共2页Xinjiang Medical Journal
摘 要:目的探讨脑梗塞后动脉溶栓与静脉溶栓的效果对比。方法病人分两组,动脉溶栓组(n=4),静脉溶栓组(n=6),比较治疗前后意识差值、肌力差值、GCS及意识清醒的时间。结果动脉溶栓组与静脉溶栓组比较,意识差值、肌力差值、GCS及意识清醒的时间两组之间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论动脉溶栓较静脉溶栓效果显著。Objective To compare the effect of cerebral infarction in intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolytic. Methods The patients were divided into two groups, arterial thrombolysis group (n=4), thrombolysis group (n=6), the difference value of consciousness, muscle strength difference and GCS difference of consciousness and conscious of time were compared before and after treatment. Results The arterial thrombolysis group compared with intravenous thrembolysis group, consciousness difference, muscle strength difference, GCS and conscious of the time difference between the two groups were statistically significant (P〈0.05). Conclusion The effect of arterial thrombolysis is better than that of intravenous thrombolysis.
分 类 号:R743.33[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3