“强制阐释论”述评  

A Commentary on “Imposed Explication”

作　　者：王翠[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]北华大学外语学院 [2]吉林大学文学院

出　　处：《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》2016年第5期90-95,共6页Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"戴维.洛奇文学批评观的形成和流变研究"(15YJC752032);吉林省社会科学基金项目"戴维.洛奇的文学批评与小说创作研究"(2015BS54)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要："强制阐释论"提出已近两年,国内外学者对这一理论给予了极大关注,纷纷阐发观点,文艺理论界就此形成了持久的对话与争鸣。本文结合"强制阐释论"提出的学术背景及其主要观点和特征,对"强制阐释论"所引发的理论对话与争鸣进行了探讨。"强制阐释论"拓展了我国文艺理论的新视域,有着重要的理论指导价值与学术创新意义。它为中国文论话语体系的构建和发展指明了方向,将阐释学理论向前推进了一步,在治学方法上给予了我们诸多启示。It has been two years since ＂Imposed Explication＂ was first put forward, which has drawn great attention both from home and abroad. There are many heated discussions and contentions in the literary field about it. This paper shows the background of the formation of ＂Imposed Explication＂, presents its key points and features, and discriminates the discussions and debates about it. ＂Imposed Explication＂ expands new horizons for China＇s literary theory and has vital theoretically instructive values and academically innovative sig- nificance. It points out the direction for the construction and development of Chinese literary theoretical system, carries hermeneutics to a new phase, and gives us much enlightenment on scholastic methods.

关 键 词：“强制阐释论” 述评 争鸣 意义 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]