检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京大学口腔医学院门诊部正畸科,100081
出 处:《中华口腔正畸学杂志》2016年第3期132-135,共4页Chinese Journal of Orthodontics
摘 要:目的 应用Mini Uni-Twin(MUT)托槽系统矫治中重度牙列拥挤的患者,评价其临床矫治效果.方法 选取安氏1类牙列拥挤的患者60例,拔除4个第一前磨牙,随机分为两组并分别应用MUT托槽系统和传统直丝弓技术进行矫治,对治疗前后的头影测量项目进行统计分析,并记录所有患者的平均疗程以及矫治器戴入后的疼痛程度.结果 30例MUT患者平均疗程17.5±2.8个月,30例传统直丝患者平均疗程21.8±3.2个月,其差异有统计学意义;第一次戴入后24 h以及48hMUT组患者的疼痛明显低于传统直丝弓组;两组间治疗前后头影测量的结果并无明显差异.结论 MUT托槽系统可减轻矫治初期的疼痛,缩短疗程,是一种高效的矫治系统.Objective To assess the clinical effects of Mini Uni-Twin(MUT) brackets in treating moderate to severe crowding.Methods 60 patients with moderate to severe crowding were selected and were extracted of 4 first premolars.They were divided into MUT brackets group and traditional straight wire group randomly.The results of cephalometric measurements before and after treatment were statistically analyzed.The average treatment time and pain level after bonding of all the patients were recorded.Results The average treatment time of MUT group was 17.5±2.8 months and that of traditional straight wire group was 21.8± 3.2 months.The difference was significant (P〈0.05).The pain level of MUT group was less than that of traditional straight wire group at 24 hours and 48 hours after bonding (P〈 0.05).However,the results of cephalometric measurements of two groups have no statistical difference.Conclusions MUT bracket is an effective appliance in treating crowding patients which can reduce pain at initial treatment and shorten treatment duration.
关 键 词:MINI Uni-Twin(MUT)托槽 牙列拥挤 头影测量
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43