检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江西师范大学心理学院,南昌330022 [2]浙江警官职业学院,杭州310018
出 处:《心理科学》2016年第5期1223-1228,共6页Journal of Psychological Science
基 金:浙江省司法厅重点项目(2013-2)的资助
摘 要:以463名男性犯罪者为调查对象,在控制人口学变量后,探讨人格、成熟应付方式、社会支持与人身危险性的关系。结果表明:(1)年龄、文化程度、婚姻和犯罪次数是人身危险性的重要预测变量。(2)人格可以显著预测人身危险性。(3)社会支持调节人格与人身危险性之间的关系。(4)这种调节作用以成熟应付方式为中介变量,其中通过中介变量起作用的调节效应占总调节效应的29.4%。因此,人格对男性犯罪者人身危险性的影响是有中介的调节效应。"Personal dangerousness" is a newly-developed concept with the rise of criminal positivism school. At present, there are two kinds of different definitions of the "personal dangerousness" in the field of criminal jurisprudence. In a narrow sense, it refers to the possibility that an offender commits a crime again (Qu, 2000). Broadly speaking, personal dangerousness is the combination of the possibility of the first offence and the possibility of the second offence (Chen, 2004). As the researchers' perspectives are different, the concept of personal dangerousness varies. In this research, the "personal dangerousness" is defined as the possibility that the criminals serving sentences seriously violate the prison regulations, commit crimes in jail and recommit crimes after release (Huang, 2004). Criminals with high personal dangerousness have the possibility of not only committing a crime again, but also infecting others as a source of crime (Zhao, 2010). Therefore, it is necessary to study the key factors and the mechanism of personal dangerousness. This study aims to explore the mediated moderation between personality, social support, mature coping style, and personal dangerousness after controlling several variables which include age, education, marital status, and crime frequency. 463 male criminals from four prisons in Zhejiang Province have taken part in the survey. The self-report questionnaires include the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, the Social Support Rating Scale, the Mature Coping Style Questionnaire and the Criminal Personal dangerousness Checklist Scale. The data have been analyzed by the Structural Equation Model using the AMOS 5.0 program. The results show that the mediated moderation model provide a good fit to the data, χ^2 = 93.75, df= 27,p 〈 .001, NFI = .95, IFI = .96, CFI = .96, RMSEA = .073. Our findings are as follows: (1) Risk. factors, which affect criminals' personal dangerousness, are age, education level, marital status and crime frequency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145