冯友兰对“哲学”与“哲学史”的区分及其意义  

The Distinction between “Philosophy” and “the History of Philosophy” by Feng Youlan and Its Significance

作　　者：蔡瑞雪[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学哲学系,上海200241

出　　处：《学术探索》2016年第10期1-6,共6页Academic Exploration

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(14XZX025);教育部人文社科青年项目(15YJC720032)

摘　　要：冯友兰不仅区分了作为事情自身的哲学史与写的哲学史,而且也区分"本然的哲学"与"实际的哲学"。在他比较使用"哲学"与"哲学史"这两个词的时候,他一般用"哲学"来指"本然的哲学",而以"哲学史"来指"实际的哲学"。"本然的哲学"层面上的"哲学"与传统思想中的"道"与"理"有相似之处,因而在传统学术向近代学术转型过程中,哲学这门从西方传来的学科可以接上"道学"或"理学"的传统。冯友兰对"哲学"与"哲学史"的区分,其价值与意义即在于此。Besides the distinction between＂ the history of philosophy＂ as the fact itself and ＂the history of philosophy＂ which is written, Feng Yonlan also distinguished between ＂philosophy in Zhenji＂ and ＂philosophy in reality＂. When Feng mentioned ＂the history of philosophy＂ and ＂philosophy＂ in pairs, he associated the term ＂the history of philosophy＂ with ＂philosophy in reality＂ and ＂philosophy＂ with ＂philosophy in Zhenji＂. There is a resemblance between ＂Philosophy＂ as ＂philosophy in Zhen- ji＂ and ＂Dao＂ and ＂Li＂. Thus through the transition of traditional academic to modem academic, philosophy as a Westem dis- cipline can take the place of Daoxue and Lixue. This is the significance of Feng Yonlan＇s distinction of ＂philosophy＂ and ＂the history of philosophy＂.

关 键 词：哲学 哲学史 冯友兰 陈黻宸 金岳霖 

分 类 号：B-49[哲学宗教]