检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冷晓明[1,2] 韩晓蕊[3] 赵曼[4] 刘宇[3] 曾道辉[2] 王晓春[2] 刘斯润[5]
机构地区:[1]暨南大学,广东广州510630 [2]广州中医药大学第一附属医院影像科,广东广州510405 [3]广州中医药大学第一临床医学院,广东广州510405 [4]广东药科大学附属第一医院影像科,广东广州510080 [5]暨南大学附属第一医院影像中心,广东广州510630
出 处:《中国医学影像技术》2016年第10期1560-1564,共5页Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基 金:广东省科技计划项目(2014A020212594)
摘 要:目的探讨传统单指数DWI和体素内不相干运动DWI(IVIM-DWI)对中央腺体区(CG)前列腺癌(PCa)及良性前列腺增生(BPH)的诊断价值。方法收集经超声引导穿刺病理证实的52例CG区前列腺病变的患者,其中PCa患者18例,共32个病灶(PCa组);BPH患者34例,共67个病灶(BPH组)。对所有患者均行前列腺单指数DWI(b=0、1 000s/mm2)及IVIM-DWI(b=10、20、30、50、80、100、200、400、1 000、1 500s/mm2)扫描,并计算ADC值、纯水分子扩散系数(D值)、灌注相关扩散系数(D*值)、灌注分数(f值)。比较2组间各参数值的差异,并评价各参数值的诊断效能。结果CG区PCa组的ADC值、D值明显低于BPH组,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.01);2组间D*值及f值差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。D值的曲线下面积为0.937(P<0.001),敏感度、特异度分别为89.60%、96.90%;ADC值曲线下面积为0.876(P<0.001),敏感度、特异度为91.00%、71.90%。D值曲线下面积大于ADC值(Z=1.299,P<0.05)。结论单指数DWI和IVIM-DWI可诊断和鉴别诊断CG区PCa和BPH,D值具有较高的诊断效能。Objective To explore the diagnostic values of traditional monoexponential DWI and intravoxel incoherent motion DWI (IVIM-DWI) in differentiating the central gland (CG) prostate cancer (PCa) from benign hyperplasia (BPH).Methods Totally 18 PCa patients with 32 focis (PCa group) and 34 BPH patients with 67 nodules (BPH group) in the CG regions were analyzed. All the patients were proved by ultrasound guided pathology. The patients underwent monoexponential DWI (b-value 0, 1 000 s/mm2) and a 10 b-values (10, 20, 30, 50, 80, 100, 200, 400, 1 000, 1 500 s/mm2) IVIM-DWI. Then the ADC value of the monoexponential DWI and the diffusion constant (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient of perfusion (D*) and perfusion fraction (f) values of the IVIM-DWI were calculated. The differences of all parameters between two groups were compared. The diagnostic performance of different parameters were evaluated by using ROC curve.Results The values of ADC and D in PCa group were significantly lower than those in BPH group (all P〈0.01). There were no significant differences between two groups in D* and f values (all P〉0.05). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of ADC values was 0.876 (P〈0.001), and corresponding diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 91.00% and 71.90%. The AUC of D values was 0.937 (P〈0.001), and corresponding diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 89.60% and 96.90%. The AUC of D value was higher than that of ADC value (Z=1.299, P〈0.05).Conclusion The monoexponential DWI and IVIM-DWI can be used to diagnose and differential diagnose of CG PCa and BPH. The D value can obtain better diagnostic performance than the ADC vlaue.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249